🔍 Read the full analysis: Indonesia’s AI Copyright Debate Pits Platforms Against New Rules on ThorstenMeyerAI.com
Get business pricing on monitors, keyboards and dev gear
- Business-only prices and quantity discounts
- Tax-exempt purchasing
- Multiple users, one account, clear invoices
TL;DR
Google, Meta and TikTok opposed parts of Indonesia’s proposed copyright-law revision at a parliamentary hearing on Nov. 11, including provisions concerning news links and AI training. The bill remains under discussion, its current text is not publicly confirmed in the source material, and no vote date has been announced.
Google, Meta and TikTok challenged Indonesia’s proposed copyright-law revision at a parliamentary hearing in Jakarta on Nov. 11, disputing provisions that could require platforms to pay publishers for displaying news links and snippets and set conditions for copyrighted material used to train artificial intelligence. The bill is still being deliberated by lawmakers and the government; it has not become law.
The hearing was held by the House of Representatives’ Legislation Body, known as Baleg. According to Kompas, lawmakers also heard from the Press Council, Dewan Pers, and Satu Lisensi Indonesia. The proposal would revise Copyright Law No. 28 of 2014, but the full text currently under discussion was not available in the source material, and reports refer to different draft versions.
Google objected to payments linked to indexing, aggregating and displaying news, including snippets, and to requiring a single collective licensing body. Its representative also argued against mandatory licenses for all AI training data and called for platforms to retain legal safe-harbor protections. Google proposed a text-and-data-mining exception with an opt-out mechanism, such as robots.txt, according to reports of the hearing.
Meta argued that sharing a link is not the same as republishing an article and said payment obligations could reduce publishers’ traffic and revenue. TikTok objected to disclosure rules applying when AI is used only as an assistive tool and also sought safe-harbor protection. These are the companies’ positions, not findings established by lawmakers.
AI copyright rules face a platform challenge Indonesia’s bill remains under debate
Google, Meta and TikTok opposed parts of a proposed copyright revision at a November 11 hearing. The bill is still under discussion, and its current wording is unconfirmed.
What platforms challenged
Their statements describe company positions, not lawmakers’ findings.
News links and AI training
Opposed payments tied to displaying news and mandatory licenses for all AI training data; proposed an opt-out for text and data mining.
Links versus republication
Argued that sharing a link is not republishing an article and that payment duties could reduce publisher traffic and revenue.
AI disclosure scope
Objected to disclosure rules applying when AI is used only as an assistive tool and sought safe-harbor protection.
Who could be affected
The final effects depend on the bill’s wording and enforcement.
- Could gain routes to compensation or control over use of their work.
- Press Council figures on advertising share and falling referral traffic were presented without underlying methodology.
- Could face payment, licensing or disclosure duties if included in the final law.
- Platforms warn broad rules could affect news access, licensing and large-scale AI training.
Where the bill stands
Baleg and the government continue deliberations; reported draft details may have changed.
Parliament approved the proposal as an initiative on March 12, 2026.
Google, Meta and TikTok challenged provisions at a Baleg hearing on November 11, 2026.
The current text is not publicly confirmed in the source material, and no vote date is announced.
Who Pays for News and AI Training
The dispute could shape how news publishers are compensated when platforms display or direct users to their work, as well as how creators’ material may be used to develop AI systems. If the bill imposes payment or licensing duties, platforms may change how they index or present Indonesian news, while publishers could gain a new route to compensation. The final effect would depend on the law’s wording and how it is enforced.
The arguments also expose a practical conflict: publishers and creators seek control and payment for use of their work, while platforms say broad obligations could limit access, disrupt existing licensing arrangements or make large-scale AI training difficult. The proposal’s treatment of AI-assisted work, disclosure and training data could affect local creators and developers, but its actual consequences cannot be determined from an unfinished draft.
Popular right now
Bose QuietComfort Wireless Noise-Cancelling Over-Ear Headphones, Twilight Blue
Ninja PB051 Single-Serve Coffee Maker for Pods and Grounds
iRobot Roomba 105 Combo Robot Vacuum & Mop with AutoEmpty Dock
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
How the Copyright Revision Advanced
The proposal is a parliamentary initiative approved as such in a plenary session on March 12, 2026. It is now being considered by Baleg together with the government. The source material says the text has changed since a draft reported in July, so provisions described from that earlier version should not be treated as settled law or necessarily as part of the current text.
Reuters reported in July that the draft would address AI-generated and AI-assisted works, potential imitation of a creator’s distinctive style, disclosure of AI use, and the use of copyrighted material for training under fair-use rules or licensing. That report cited law ministry official Hermansyah Siregar, who said the draft was not final. The July account also described proposed payments for platforms that aggregate or display news and possible sanctions for noncompliance. The current version’s specific language remains unverified.
Indonesia already has Presidential Regulation No. 32 of 2024, which requires digital platforms to support quality journalism. At the hearing, Dewan Pers deputy chair Totok Suryanto said the regulation had not worked as intended and platform compliance was low, according to Aktual. Dewan Pers also told lawmakers that platforms take 80 percent of digital advertising and that traffic from platforms to news sites has fallen by up to 70 percent. Those figures were presented by the press council, and the source material does not provide their underlying methodology.
“A levy on links would leave Google “no choice” but to stop crawling, indexing and distributing Indonesian news.”
— Google representative Agung Pamungkas, as reported by Reuters
The Draft’s Current Wording Is Unclear
The full text under discussion was not available in the source material, and the proposal has changed since July. News reports cite different versions, so details such as article numbers and the precise scope of payment obligations should be treated cautiously. The July draft’s AI provisions may also have been revised.
It is not yet clear how lawmakers would define sufficient human involvement for copyright protection of AI-assisted work, how any style-imitation restriction would be applied, or what exceptions would govern AI training. The source material also gives no announced date for a vote and no final agreement among lawmakers, the government, platforms or publishers.
Lawmakers Continue Bill Deliberations
Baleg and the government are continuing to deliberate on the revision. The next developments to watch are the publication or reporting of a clearer current draft, any changes to the news-payment and AI provisions, and a parliamentary timetable for further debate or a vote. No vote date has been announced in the source material.
Until lawmakers approve a final text and it takes effect, the reported provisions remain proposals. Statements by platforms and the Press Council describe their positions in the debate; they do not establish what obligations the eventual law will impose or how platforms will respond.
Key Questions
Has Indonesia passed the proposed copyright-law revision?
No. The revision remains under deliberation by parliament’s Legislation Body and the government. The source material reports no final approval or vote date.
What are the platforms objecting to?
Google disputes proposed payments for news links and snippets, a single collective licensing body and mandatory licenses for AI training data. Meta says sharing links is not republication and warns that payment duties could reduce publisher traffic and revenue. TikTok says disclosure rules should not apply when AI only assists with content creation. These are company arguments.
What AI rules were described in the July draft?
A July draft reported by Reuters addressed AI-assisted works, disclosure, imitation of a creator’s distinctive style and copyrighted material used to train AI under fair-use rules or licensing. The draft was described as not final, and the current text may differ.
When will lawmakers vote?
No vote date has been announced in the source material. The bill is still being considered by Baleg and the government.
Source: ThorstenMeyerAI.com
